4 ms·
So you think corporations should be able to cherry pick the regulations they follow? Seems a great idea for consumer rights, environmental protection, etc.
by tasogare 7y ago
So you think corporations should be able to cherry pick the regulations they follow? Seems a great idea for consumer rights, environmental protection, etc.
- wbl 7y agoObeying the law worked so well for IG Farben.
- Aperocky 7y agoTBF, it sucked for them mostly because Nazis lost the war. I'm sure whoever profited from constructing internment camp of Japanese during the same era went through it just fine.
- briantakita 7y agoIG Farben was broken up into Bayer, Monsanto, BASF, etc. Also many in the NSDAP were brought over to America via Operation Paperclip. Many went to the Soviet Union, Argentina, & remained in West & East Germany.
- javert 7y agoThe Japanese internment in the U.S. is not remotely comparable to the Nazis.
- kissickas 7y agoHe said "when necessary," and in the context of evildoing. Not "when convenient" or "when profitable."
- AaronFriel 7y agoYes, if you struggle to imagine situations in which corporations could be given orders that violate human rights, you should think back to a dark era of European politics that occurred only some 70 years ago. Or the Jim Crow era in America, with enforced segregation. Whether bringing the Great Firewall to Hong Kong rises to that degree of a human rights violation is a very reasonable question, but as a blanket rule? You can't say all corporations should always follow all laws. That isn't a just society, that's one full, excuse the parlance, bootlickers to the oppressors.
- mindslight 7y agoEver heard of civil disobedience ? The metric obviously isn't to just disobey the law, but to disobey it for some larger purpose.