I think glenstein is already past that point, you might be talking about different things. Drexler's solution is pretty good but it seems like a stopgap measure

I think glenstein is already past that point, you might be talking about different things. Drexler's solution is pretty good but it seems like a stopgap measure. Sure, if the subsystem is bound and specific there's no AGI risk, but are we just going to call it a day and stop AI research? The article seems to agree with my sentiment: > The very fact that [a Drexlerian agent] is less effective than the Bostromian agent suggests there will be pressure to build the Bostromian agent eventually (Drexler disagrees with this, but I don’t understand why)