3 ms·

Isn't this something that only recently has become possible, and still has an accuracy cost?

• starsinspace 7y ago
  iOS already has a separate feature "offline dictation" which works on-device. I don't understand why that isn't used for Siri. Also about "recently"... back in the late 90s I had a desktop PC running Windows 98, I think it was a Pentium 166 MHz with 32 MB RAM. On it, I had a voice recognition program called "Dragon Naturally Speaking". It required a little training with my voice but after that, it worked remarkably well. And that was over 20 years ago on a PC with a - by today's standards - very primitive CPU. Decent voice recognition isn't new technology.
  • GeekyBear 7y ago
    The problem with Dragon was that it was so inaccurate that a moderately skilled typist could produce final corrected text much more quickly than they could dictate text and then make corrections. Looking online, this is a feature Apple is adding in this year's iOS and Google is adding to Pixel devices only so far, so I would expect to have to give them some time to get on device speech recognition working at all as a first step.
  • jbverschoor 7y ago
    Exactly. Also, smart Siri is so stupid, it recently started correcting the contact I want to call to someone else, even though it was properly recognized and transcribed. Funny thing is I call this person daily, and the other one was 6-7 years ago Frustrating as hell