4 ms·
Says who? Merriam-webster's first definition is "too extraordinary and improbable to be believed". Cambridge: "impossible or very difficult to believe:" Dict
by knicholes 7y ago
Says who? Merriam-webster's first definition is "too extraordinary and improbable to be believed".
Cambridge: "impossible or very difficult to believe:"
Dictionary.com: "so extraordinary as to seem impossible:
incredible speed.
not credible; hard to believe; unbelievable:
The plot of the book is incredible."
Or is dictionary.com too incredible?
And, I know I'm risking hardcore my karma here, but I see "good" used as a moral measure. I doubt that "incredible" is referring to the interviewee's moral excellence, but I could imagine that perhaps the interviews are along the lines of becoming a better person.
- goodcanadian 7y agoPerhaps, I should have specified that it has come to mean good in this context. It probably started out as a short hand for something like "incredibly good" (as in, "it's hard to believe it's so good"). As long as we're quoting dictionary definitions (also from dictionary.com). We're using definition 2, here: incredible adjective 1. beyond belief or understanding; unbelievable 2. informal marvellous; amazing Good is definitely a judgment, but there is no reason to suppose it is a moral one. If I say a sandwich is good, it means that I like the taste not that I think it is righteous in the eyes of God. Ironically, perhaps, if I thought the sandwich was especially delicious, I might say that it is righteous. The vast majority of native English speakers would immediately understand my intended meaning rather than the literal one. I find it somewhat incredible that I have to explain this.