I see no a priori reason why "superintelligent services" as defined in the review would necessarily be inherently safer, due to the complexity of the systems th

I see no a priori reason why "superintelligent services" as defined in the review would necessarily be inherently safer, due to the complexity of the systems they affect, and the possibility of emergent effects that might be in some sense equivalent to the hypothetical effects of an "agent type" AI. I also think that the concept needs more elaboration for that very reason. Furthermore, it could be that there is a "recipe" for forming general AI by integrating a small number of "service type" AIs, assuming that term refers to a real concept in the first place.