3 ms·
Please, to anyone so passionately critical of W3Schools: Write highly-accessible tutorials that teach the way code _should_ be written. Until that happens, no
by adelevie 16y ago
Please, to anyone so passionately critical of W3Schools:
Write highly-accessible tutorials that teach the way code _should_ be written.
Until that happens, noobs will continue to rely on W3Schools (and perhaps Tizag.com) for learning the all-important first steps for programming.
I have almost zero formal education with programming. Thanks to W3Schools and Tizag, I was able to get started and eventually become a technical co-founder of a startup.
Looking back, here are some of the most important things I learned from these two sites:
-HTML renders into a readable web page
-Server-side code ultimately renders into HTML
-The source for server-side code is private
-The source for client-side code is public
-You need a database to store data (not so obvious!)
-You can organize code in certain ways to make your life easier (eg. writing functions)
-The very basics of OO concepts
Without W3Schools or Tizag, I _never_ would have learned these concepts. No one was going to sit down and teach me, nor was I going to magically deduce them.
Bottom line: W3School lowers the barriers to entry for learning how to program. This can only be good for the startup ecosystem, and ultimately, for the economy.
- tbranyen 16y agoW3C huh...
- adelevie 16y agoWhoops!
- tbranyen 16y agoWhy did you change your original post, your typo seems to be exactly what these guys were talking about. The confusion between the naming is not good. For those who are coming later, the OP of this thread had said W3C instead of w3schools. Tell me the naming is not confusing...