3 ms·
Assuming you don't want emacs, so... If you don't mind branching out Racket w/Dr Racket is zero setup and great fun w/great docs. If you go Clojure, many opti
by methehack 7y ago
Assuming you don't want emacs, so...
If you don't mind branching out Racket w/Dr Racket is zero setup and great fun w/great docs. If you go Clojure, many options that don't require setup (LightTable, maybe, e.g). If you want to stay common lisp, Lisp Works has a "personal" and "hobby" version of their IDE and that's free, zero setup, and a mature IDE.
- methehack 7y agoOh I guess my "assuming you don't want emacs, so..." was interpreted as a ding against emacs so I was downvoted... I don't care about the downvote, but ftr, I a have been using emacs daily for about 25 years, spacemacs now, and love it. So there. All I meant was that the OP I assumed knew about emacs and it's lisp history and was choosing Atom instead. The reason to do that would be learning curve, which I respect. Fair enough; I judge not. Just... you, know, for clarity.
- jonathankoren 7y agoFTR the reason why i don't use emacs is because it frustratingly has too many degrees of freedom, and thus is perpetually misconfigured, and I find it has atrocious UX. The last emacs I used with any regularity was XEmacs.