> Technically this was always a possibility Even worse, as people normalize the use of a surveillance technology (a technology in general, NOT a specific produ

> Technically this was always a possibility Even worse, as people normalize the use of a surveillance technology (a technology in general, NOT a specific product), eventually it will pass the "in general public use" test created by Kyllo v United States. When that happens, using that technology is no longer a search and thus the police no longer need a warrant to use it. The people normalizing surveillance tech are eroding our future 4th Amendment protection. (see my previous post[1] about this for references) [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20595358 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20595358