> all it takes is their expert saying that "we can prove beyond resonable doubt that the file is encrypted" and you are screwed. I'm pretty sure this wouldn't

> all it takes is their expert saying that "we can prove beyond resonable doubt that the file is encrypted" and you are screwed. I'm pretty sure this wouldn't fly in the UK, wouldn't the expert need to demonstrate to a Jury and the defence council how he "proved beyond reasonable doubt" so the proof could be refuted? In fact it might not work in the US. I remember a pedo trial collapsing because the feds were unwilling to explain in open court how they tracked people via the dark web.