One of the themes of the book is that a lot of results from people like Arrow, Coase etc. are misrepresented by those belong to that group. From what I remember

One of the themes of the book is that a lot of results from people like Arrow, Coase etc. are misrepresented by those belong to that group. From what I remember it is actually pretty complimentary about Arrow and his work - the criticisms being aimed at those who take such things out of context to further ideological arguments. Edit: I wish I had a paper copy so I could refer to it more easily!