4 ms·
(no snark intended) Are you aware of, or did you consider the historical context behind this name? (the operating system, NeXTSTEP)
by octotoad 7y ago
(no snark intended)
Are you aware of, or did you consider the historical context behind this name? (the operating system, NeXTSTEP)
- tobr 7y agoMy first thought too. Wouldn’t Apple still own a trademark of some kind for this word?
- fredoralive 7y agoYep… https://www.apple.com/legal/intellectual-property/trademark/nexttmlist.html https://www.apple.com/legal/intellectual-property/trademark/...
- rvz 7y agoAnd it does include the actual 'NextStep' trademark with the OP's product name 'NextStep' which is the exact same style: > The absence of a product or service name or logo from this list does not constitute a waiver of NeXT’s trademark or other intellectual property rights concerning that name or logo. If I were the OP, I would think of another name than to pay Apple for usage of the trademark and have to place 'NextStep is a trademark of Apple Inc.' like how Apple is paying for iOS with Cisco owning the IOS trademark.
- n8henry 7y ago"Next Step" is a common phrase. Multiple companies currently have a live trademark for "NextStep."