4 ms·
He failed to prove that he’s the inventor of Bitcoin. That doesn’t prove that he isn’t.
by steve_taylor 7y ago
He failed to prove that he’s the inventor of Bitcoin. That doesn’t prove that he isn’t.
- letstrynvm 7y agoIf he was though, it'd have various implications such as it not being difficult to prove he had access to his own private keys. I can imagine you might be the guy and not want to prove it, or it to be known. But actively claiming to be the guy and not proving it indisputibly when you could... what'd be the point?
- andirk 7y agoBesides having private keys to early wallets, my #1 reason to not believe him is his arrogance and loving attention. The Nakamoto(s) that wrote the white paper and spoke on forums about it was/were very anonymous and privacy-obsessed.