4 ms·

I'm not convinced that this is a 'blatant violation of the First Amendment'. How is this any different from banning billboards, which is currently the case for

by Evidlo 7y ago

I'm not convinced that this is a 'blatant violation of the First Amendment'. How is this any different from banning billboards, which is currently the case for Vermont, Alaska, Hawaii and Maine?

true_religion 7y ago
This is like banning posters inside buildings that are open to the public. It’s invasive.