4 ms·
Hire user here. IMO the product was functional (and cheap relative to the market) but not good. There were a lot of UX quirks that made it feel like an outside
by Dwolb 7y ago
Hire user here. IMO the product was functional (and cheap relative to the market) but not good.
There were a lot of UX quirks that made it feel like an outside consultancy slapped some “Material” design on a pre-built app and called it a day.
Really I would’ve liked to see a product like this be a meta-layer on top of GSuite productivity tools. ie Interview feedback forms should be a Forms form, the job board should be more like Sites.
From a strategic standpoint I had no idea why they pursued this particular product. The output here never seemed particularly well-aligned to any strategic motive.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- rhizome 7y ago>made it feel like an outside consultancy slapped some “Material” design on a pre-built app and called it a day. Google's replacement motto for "Don't be evil" is "Launch and forget."
- xmprt 7y ago> From a strategic standpoint I had no idea why they pursued this particular product A manager wanted a promotion