3 ms·
Maybe you should have read the article instead, or at least the introductory paragraph, which states: "Imperialism was both normal and common worldwide through
by gridlockd 7y ago
Maybe you should have read the article instead, or at least the introductory paragraph, which states:
"Imperialism was both normal and common worldwide throughout recorded history, the earliest examples dating from the mid-third millennium BC, diminishing only in the late 20th century."
I am not aware of any capitalists or corporations predating the Iron Age, but perhaps you can enlighten me there.
> Also capitalism implies imperialism, not the other way around.
I would disagree that capitalism implies imperialism, but let's put that aside. My claim was exactly that imperialism doesn't imply capitalism, so I guess we agree on that? Non-implication is not exclusion, mind you. The Soviet Union was imperialist, but not capitalist.
Having said, that, I'm sure there is a fruitless debate to be had with those Trotzkists that would claim that the Soviet Union was imperialist, capitalist and fascist[1].
[1] https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-3/iwk-ussr.htm https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-3/iwk-ussr.htm