4 ms·
Exactly! I don’t see how anyone can justify permanently altering a human life like this, in the absence of a clear pathology. Wouldn’t it be better to simply n
by teh_infallible 7y ago
Exactly! I don’t see how anyone can justify permanently altering a human life like this, in the absence of a clear pathology.
Wouldn’t it be better to simply not have a child?
- AstralStorm 7y agoEasily. If it is an improvement with low chances of failure and even lower of catastrophic failure, why leave all the failures to nature? Not having, say, HIV resistance could be considered a failure of nature, a deficit. We're not talking about frivolous modifications for no reason here.