4 ms·
just because that work was "creative"? That's where the IP theory all falls down. Originality or uniqueness doesn't exists, creation is all about recreating f
by ttoinou 7y ago
just because that work was "creative"?
That's where the IP theory all falls down. Originality or uniqueness doesn't exists, creation is all about recreating from what you learned from others. Creation is stealing in a moral and respectful way. Protecting your creations with IP laws is immoral and unrespectful against your public and previous artists you took from
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- rayiner 7y agoThat's a straw man. Copyright doesn't prohibit someone from learning from your work. It prohibits (in the US) five specific acts: reproduction, preparation of derivative works, distribution of copies, public performance, and display. You don't need to be able to define a work of purely unique expression. All you need to be able to do is define when a work is sufficiently original that it's not a derivative work or reproduction.
- ttoinou 7y ago1. Protecting with IP ¡= Copyright 2. I didn't say Copyright prevents others from learning 3. A work is never sufficiently original, it's always a derivative