> I don't know this kid's particular case Perhaps it's best to withhold outrage until you do. > I find it pretty irritating that whenever people want to discu

> I don't know this kid's particular case Perhaps it's best to withhold outrage until you do. > I find it pretty irritating that whenever people want to discuss a potential direct consequence of something a politician did, people immediately act like it's unfair to start talking about things until we have "all the facts". I find it irritating when someone takes a one-sided account of a developing situation and reflexively uses it to attack their villain du-jour. > does that mean we shouldn't be discussing potential negative consequences of bad legislation? You weren't discussing bad legislation, just calling the sitting President a racist for the deportation, for which we don't have full details, which has also been a common feature of a number of prior administrations. You're not discussing anything, you're ranting and attacking.