3 ms·
> The richer people are the more they drive, the more likely they are to drive to work and the more cars they have. That may be the case in Germany. In the US,
by maxsilver 7y ago
> The richer people are the more they drive, the more likely they are to drive to work and the more cars they have.
That may be the case in Germany. In the US, the exact opposite is nearly universally true.
Rich people own lots of cars, but they are less likely to need to drive them anywhere. (In part, because Rich people already own all the best land in all the best cities with all the best alternative transportation. And in part because, Rich people outsource their driving to Taxis / Uber-Taxis / Lyft-taxis)
Working class people are the people most harmed by the elimination of public vehicle transportation. These folks, generally speaking, can not afford to live anywhere where alternate transportation options might exist. And the act of building new transportation for them, nearly always prices them out of living in that place.
Since the article above is about LA, here's a specific example from LA, about how LA's attempts to expand their bus/rail system are gentrifying out their own ridership - https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-rosenthal-transit-gentrification-metro-ridership-20180220-story.html https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-rosenthal-transi...
- hannob 7y ago> That may be the case in Germany. In the US, the exact opposite is nearly universally true. Any data on that? At least the first Google results I find indicate a very similar correlation. If I believe this https://www.sightline.org/2012/03/08/how-income-and-neighborhoods-affect-driving/ https://www.sightline.org/2012/03/08/how-income-and-neighbor... then definitely there's a connection between "richer" and "more driving", though there's a bit of plateauing (i.e. the rich don't drive more than the middle income), but the poor definitely drive fewer.