2 ms·
Ok sure but how can I say it without being accused of being anti-semitic, I was thinking using the intelligence agency name is more appropriate than an entire c
by svd4anything 7y ago
Ok sure but how can I say it without being accused of being anti-semitic, I was thinking using the intelligence agency name is more appropriate than an entire country!
I am NOT ever anti-semitic, but maybe Mossad gets away with crazy stuff exactly because any westerner who complains is immediately branded as such.
Note: the entire post is flagged now and removed from HN front page.
- dragonwriter 7y ago> Ok sure but how can I say it without being accused of being anti-semitic It would help to present some rational basis supporting the, conclusion. Of course, if you can't see how your conclusion could be seen as anything other than anti-Semitic, maybe there is a reason for that.
- svd4anything 7y agoNo there is many indicators that Mossad is the most likely sponsor. His well established link to Ehud Barak the ex-PM who has deep extensive intelligence history is an example. It would be extremely long post to detail all the evidence. It’s not unreasonable to suspect he successfully compromised both a sitting US president and the son of the Queen of England, and that is only the beginning of the list. Which intel agency is most likely? Obviously Mossad should be at the top of the list ... but yeah OK let’s remove it, I’m anti-semitic.