3 ms·
> No - not for having a YT channel (per se) but for engaging in communications that FB considered to be a conflict of interest. What was the conflict of intere
by alephnan 7y ago
> No - not for having a YT channel (per se) but for engaging in communications that FB considered to be a conflict of interest.
What was the conflict of interest?
> And probably (as with most firings), a whole whole bunch of other stuff (besides the nominal "reason").
Probably, but not certainly.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- occitan 7y agoWhat was the conflict of interest? Dunno - whatever was running through the HR people's heads. The whole point is - it wasn't simply for "having a YouTube channel".