I was there in the PHP 4.x days too during the early 2000s, and you know, I really liked it. It just made things so simple to understand and work with. Look up

I was there in the PHP 4.x days too during the early 2000s, and you know, I really liked it. It just made things so simple to understand and work with. Look up a function, see a bunch of examples in the docs and use it right away without having to worry about imports and lugging around a ton of baggage. I think the main reason PHP got such a bad rap for flat functions is because they implemented it poorly. So many things were extremely inconsistent when it came to naming conventions and argument orders that it became near impossible to remember them in a systematic way. But couldn't that problem be addressed today since we're aware that naming consistency is an important programming language feature? > I can see it for core libraries, but outside of that I think namespaces are necessary for the greater language ecosystem. Yeah I could get on board with that. Docker sort of does this now with Docker images. At the UI level (the tooling we use in our day to day like the CLI) we don't need to access "elixir" or "python" images with a namespace (Docker adds it for us automatically), but we are free to create our own brightball/elixir or nickjj/elixir images to avoid conflicts. But in a programming world, I would like to type brightball_elixir at call time in my code instead of importing elixir from brightball, because with the latter I have no idea if elixir is coming from you, me, or the standard library unless I move away from the code and look at the import.