4 ms·
I agree on the flavor but I think part of it is that it's a lot of hassle and just doesn't look as appealing as breast meat. There's a higher chance of biting i
by claudiawerner 7y ago
I agree on the flavor but I think part of it is that it's a lot of hassle and just doesn't look as appealing as breast meat. There's a higher chance of biting into gristle/something hard, the meat can be "slimy", and I find that at chains that do "fried chicken", at least, they do a generally poorer job of breading the meat. It's not crunchy and battered like a "chicken tender". Thighs are a different matter since you can pick/scrape off the bone with a knife and fork, but they're also larger so the batter to chicken ratio is sub-optimal.
Wings are tolerated because they're small and predictable, but I've been seeing the rise of "boneless wings" too. People generally don't have a problem with the thighs and legs of the chicken if it's served differently or just as "chicken" in another product. But on the bone it's messy.
- phonypc 7y ago"Boneless wings" are just pieces of breast shaped vaguely like wings. Or processed meat, like nuggets.
- tripzilch 7y agoI don't think meat should be optimized for how easily you can mindlessly stuff it down your throat without paying attention, though.
- Sohcahtoa82 7y ago"Boneless wings" are nothing more than chicken nuggets with a fancy name. When I cook any recipe with chicken, I replace the chicken breast with boneless thighs (Which actually is thigh meat with the bones removed), and it comes out so much better.