3 ms·
The "precedent" at issue is not about the ruling as a matter of common law but as an indicator of verdicts to come.
by staticautomatic 7y ago
The "precedent" at issue is not about the ruling as a matter of common law but as an indicator of verdicts to come.
- henryfjordan 7y ago"precedent" is a term of art in law. It strictly means another court HAS to make the same ruling given the same/similar facts.
- staticautomatic 7y agoThis particular case has not set such a precedent.