3 ms·

> How is that not racist? I would argue that not including the citizenship question is racist. It makes logical sense to include it, to do otherwise is to mani

> How is that not racist? I would argue that not including the citizenship question is racist. It makes logical sense to include it, to do otherwise is to manipulate the results based on race. > He wanted to scare Latinos into not filling out the census and put it writing. Again, I say this as a minority. It doesn't feel great to be used as a pawn. As a citizen I would have absolutely no problem answering that question. Many, many Latinos would also be ok with it, so putting words in their mouth is an example of racism coming from the Left.

save_ferris 7y ago
> I would argue that not including the citizenship question is racist. Well, the current administration abandoned this effort after the memos were leaked because they knew this argument wouldn't hold up in court. And it no way holds up here. You choose to willfully ignore the fact that the genesis of this question by the GOP was explicitly to keep Latinos on the sidelines. > Again, I say this as a minority. Asserting your identity as if that adds credence to your argument while ignoring the simple fact that it's illogical doesn't help you in any way. It doesn't matter what you look like or where you're from, you're argument is still illogical. > Many, many Latinos would also be ok with it, so putting words in their mouth is an example of racism coming from the Left. You literally just put words in the mouths of Latinos at the beginning of that sentence only to accuse the left of doing so. The census in its current form doesn't have any questions designed to keep minority members of the community from participating, can you provide a reason why the census in its current form is racist?