I didn't mean to imply my comment gave good coverage of the topic, just wanted to point out that "fair use" is focused on finding a balance between respecting c

I didn't mean to imply my comment gave good coverage of the topic, just wanted to point out that "fair use" is focused on finding a balance between respecting copyright while protecting the freedom to make transformative works. It was definitely a nitpick comment on my part, with little real-world relevance to the original comment because it's inconceivable his personal-transcript would be legally challenged. And because it's so much work to manually-transcribe, to the point where he's likely to make mistakes and deliberate alterations and additions of his own, it'd be even more work to argue that it wasn't transformative, nevermind that it had any profit impact whatsoever.