4 ms·
This is tangential, but I really dislike how this YouTube channel always downloads the original video, strips it of all information regarding the speaker and th
by blindseer 7y ago
This is tangential, but I really dislike how this YouTube channel always downloads the original video, strips it of all information regarding the speaker and the conference and uploads it to their channel. Even though the original is published under Creative Commons Attribution, it still bothers me that they 1) download and reupload (wouldn't this be better accomplished by a playlist?) 2) strip information that makes it appear they produce the content. I'm curious what other people think about this.
Anyway, here is the source [1] from their video description.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0vlD7r-kTc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0vlD7r-kTc
- perlpimp 7y agostripping is not good but corralling and filtering videos maybe not so bad. maybe in the future content id can let people know of people from which a given video originates? that would be a useful exploration feature.
- indalo 7y agoI'd like curated content to have a larger presence as well. I wonder If enhancing playlists could accomplish this. You can add metadata and arrange while the video remains on its channel. On the other hand I doubt a lot of reuploading is done in earnest.
- dang 7y agoOK, we've changed to that from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTt1AVRQyx0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTt1AVRQyx0.
- saagarjha 7y agoCan we link to the CCC page instead? It has the video along with additional resources: https://media.ccc.de/v/35c3-9941-how_facebook_tracks_you_on_android https://media.ccc.de/v/35c3-9941-how_facebook_tracks_you_on_...
- dang 7y agoSure. Changed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0vlD7r-kTc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0vlD7r-kTc.
- input_sh 7y agoNot to mention that they're breaking the license by not indicating that they've made changes to the original work. As far as 2) is concerned, that's allowed by Creative Commons Attribution, but it must be indicated that the changes were made. Just the fact that they've cropped the video makes their video a modification. From[0]: > How do I properly attribute material offered under a Creative Commons license? > You must also indicate if you have modified the work—for example, if you have taken an excerpt, or cropped a photo. [0] https://creativecommons.org/faq/#how-do-i-properly-attribute-material-offered-under-a-creative-commons-license https://creativecommons.org/faq/#how-do-i-properly-attribute...