3 ms·
You would if you lived in Washington, D.C. Due to its unique status as a “Federal district” ceded to the government by Maryland and Virginia, the only Congressi
by smacktoward 7y ago
You would if you lived in Washington, D.C. Due to its unique status as a “Federal district” ceded to the government by Maryland and Virginia, the only Congressional representation the 700,000 residents of D.C. get is a single non-voting delegate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia%27s_at-large_congressional_district https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia%27s_at-la...
(Despite this, they are of course taxed the same as everyone else, creating a weird modern-day case of “taxation without representation”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_taxation_without_representation#District_of_Columbia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_taxation_without_representa...)
- redis_mlc 7y agoThanks for posting the interesting example of “taxation without representation”. A couple other interesting things related: 1) One East Coast tribe was not defeated militarily. It's lands were gradually nibbled away with lawyering (zoning changes) over a period of decades. 2) During the Western Indian Wars, an equal number of soldiers and warriors died on both sides, about 10,000 each.
- 5555624 7y ago>Due to its unique status as a “Federal district” ceded to the government by Maryland and Virginia, It should be noted that Virginia's portion was given back -- retrocession -- in 1847. This is why one option that comes up for providing voting rights is to give the non-federal government portions of DC back to Maryland. This would keep the Federal District separate from any state; but, residents of what is currently DC would have voting representation. What was Virgina's contribution is Arlington County, VA.