5 ms·
Nothing is stopping you from storing your savings in gold right now. You don’t need the gold standard for that.
by mikeash 7y ago
Nothing is stopping you from storing your savings in gold right now. You don’t need the gold standard for that.
- cbanek 7y agoOther than needing to safely store your gold somewhere. I'm guessing there's probably also some insurance you could get to protect against loss? With a bank these are generally "free" with laws that protect deposits.
- mikeash 7y agoIf you trust others to keep it for you, there are companies that let you buy gold online that they will store for you, and there are even gold ETFs. If you have a brokerage account, buy some shares of GLD and you’re done.
- rightbyte 7y agoIf you don't trust the financial system surely you don't trust gold certificates either. Dig it down ... atleast I would.
- mikeash 7y agoThe original comment mentioned the gold standard, which is just gold certificates used as everyday currency. If you don’t trust that sort of stuff then the gold standard is totally irrelevant anyway.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- the-dude 7y agoLast week I stumbled upon an article which claimed the Dutch government ( NL ) has the power to claim all private gold in the country. If it is true, I wonder if similar laws exist in other countries.
- johnchristopher 7y agoSee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Reserve_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Reserve_Act and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102#Similar_laws_in_other_countries https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102#Similar_l... and https://www.quora.com/Why-did-it-used-to-be-illegal-for-Americans-to-own-gold https://www.quora.com/Why-did-it-used-to-be-illegal-for-Amer...
- big_chungus 7y agoWell I've considered doing it, but I'm here in America where Roosevelt stole gold at a whim ("mandatory buy-back" at $400/oz in today's currency, where the price is over $1,500). I do like the concept, but I'm not confident one of these kooky big-spending politicians won't decide to steal it to pay for some program. Regardless, most people won't do this due to liquidity issues. Why can't we just put the currency back on gold? That's like saying we shouldn't put an embargo on Iran because "Every one could just stop buying oil from her."
- javert 7y ago> Why can't we just put the currency back on gold? Because politicians will take it back off gold again when it suits them. Sorry to be "that guy," but this is why bitcoin was created.
- big_chungus 7y ago> this is why bitcoin was created I like the idea of cryptocurrency, but bitcoin is an awful store of value compared to gold. I haven't found a recent calculation for the beta of bitcoin, but it's something pretty crazy. Also, china controls over 2/3 of btc hashing power; I don't trust her with a penny.
- javert 7y agoI don't agree with you, but I upvoted you. Bitcoin was designed to replay gold/fiat money, but definitely hasn't grown up yet in terms of liquidity. That's OK in my book.
- arcticbull 7y agoDon't be the guy advocating putting money into bitcoin to store value when we know 95% of all bitcoin trading volume is fake [1], the primary liquidity supplier in the space is currently being investigated by the NYAG for being a giant fraud [2] and the price is manipulated to serve exchanges looking to trim short and long positions. It's beanie babies for nerds. Parent said "safe" and BTC is about as safe as a chainsaw made of razor blades with no hand guard. [1] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/22/majority-of-bitcoin-trading-is-a-hoax-new-study-finds.html https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/22/majority-of-bitcoin-trading-... [2] https://cointelegraph.com/news/tethers-trouble-with-new-york-attorney-general-will-crypto-cope https://cointelegraph.com/news/tethers-trouble-with-new-york...