The comment reads: > you could go find better examples (with a free license) or take your own and add them to the article. That > they decide to explain to m

The comment reads: > you could go find better examples (with a free license) or take your own and add them to the article. That > they decide to explain to me that I can edit Wikipedia! is simply untrue. Had that been the case, I’m sure everyone would agree it was patronising. However it does not say "you can edit Wikipedia," more like "if you think there is a problem, you are free to fix the problem." Indeed English can be ambiguous, but I do not think that can be interpreted as patronizing.