5 ms·
There’s a strong argument to be made that overall health impacts will be lower if wildfires are reduced through prescribed burns rather than waiting for catastr
by torpfactory 7y ago
There’s a strong argument to be made that overall health impacts will be lower if wildfires are reduced through prescribed burns rather than waiting for catastrophic ‘natural’ fires. I think this argument could be used. We can either plan ahead when to have some wildfire smoke and put resources in place to deal with it. Or we can try to react to large blazes.
- fjabre 7y agoFast effective reaction to mega blazes will be key. That they are pretty much talking about the same thing they have been for decades is depressing.
- wbl 7y agoCEQA doesnt work that way as I understand. We need to repeal it.
- labster 7y agoThis is like saying: Safari doesn’t support AV1 as I understand. We need to delete it. Isn’t the obvious thing here to make a patch so it supports the thing we want?
- wbl 7y agoCEQA fundamentally has a status quo bias because of how you do the analysis. Avoided damage from what would happen anyway is not considered.