3 ms·
>Obviously, earth has more than recovered from a comet strike. It's hard to believe that what we are doing could be worse. Earth did, after millions of years a
by Baeocystin 7y ago
>Obviously, earth has more than recovered from a comet strike. It's hard to believe that what we are doing could be worse.
Earth did, after millions of years and a mass extinction. I'd rather not have that happen to the biosphere if it is something we can control.
Some food for thought: Earth is already well on the backside of how much longer it will be able to support life. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_Earth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_Earth for more details) Stopping damage now is the better option that thinking "Eh, things will recover in geologic time." Geologic time is running out.
tl;dr- Earth is ~4.5 billion years old. Solar output increases by ~1% every 110 million years. There are ~500 million years left before long-term processes make Earth a hostile place for life.
- yters 7y agoRight, so it's not earth we are concerned about, b/c earth is doomed anyways. It's human welfare we are concerned about, and that should be how the debate is framed. In what way does climate change possibly impact human welfare and what is the most practical way to address those impacts? Not a blanket 'climate change is bad so stop all CO2 production!'
- Baeocystin 7y agoThe IPCC report goes in to what the actionable items are in great depth. If you're interested in what we know, and what the best steps are to do, it should be your starting point. https://www.ipcc.ch/2019/08/08/land-is-a-critical-resource_srccl/ https://www.ipcc.ch/2019/08/08/land-is-a-critical-resource_s... will get you started.