Releasing code with a license (OSS or whatever) doesn't entitle users to support or make demands when they use it incorrectly. The author's email address is giv

Releasing code with a license (OSS or whatever) doesn't entitle users to support or make demands when they use it incorrectly. The author's email address is given in the source code with the expectation that some basic courtesy is exercised by the consumer of the library with regard to communication with the author and not entitled demands. If I'm a baker and sell you a loaf of my bread, I don't expect folks to email me complaining their welsh rarebit didn't come out right from the grill. Learn to cook or, in this perhaps strained analogy, learn to program and then come back and ask a more intelligent question. > rage quit And there we go, the automatic assumption that because an author has basically had enough of ignorant twats you paint their actions with these lazy characterisations. I don't think this author rage quit, he's just had enough of people with "contrarian" opinions such as yours. A license !== user entitlement.