> Netflix, youtube, and facebook can stream fine on lower bandwidth links. They really cannot, at least with quality levels that make people actually want to w

> Netflix, youtube, and facebook can stream fine on lower bandwidth links. They really cannot, at least with quality levels that make people actually want to watch them. > The economic value of high resolution mobile streaming seems rather low, at best. Many multi-billion dollar companies and streaming services would disagree. As would many investors. > Most likely negative, because most content is just time-wasting, and because content that actually matters tends to not depend so much on resolution beyond SD or basic HD (720p) This is entirely your opinion about what content you prefer. Once again, there's literally hundreds of billions of dollars that says otherwise. > 5G might be better than 4G for mobile side energy use, but unless it's close to 802.11ax levels and mobile providers offer cheap bandwidth-limited service plans, I don't see why anyone would use it for IoT applications. This is not the problem 5G solves. It solves latency, availability and throughput. > I'm sure new businesses will capitalize on increased bandwidth from 5G, but I'm doubtful that it will benefit society. You are doubtful that the creation of numerous companies, highly paid jobs and adding hundreds of billions of dollars to the US economy won't benefit society?