3 ms·
W.r.t. polyandry, yes, you're right. I was thinking polygyny. My mistake. In terms of polyandry, I meant the non-sex specific, general defects still hold. Cert
by bobthechef 7y ago
W.r.t. polyandry, yes, you're right. I was thinking polygyny. My mistake.
In terms of polyandry, I meant the non-sex specific, general defects still hold. Certainly, polyandry specifically inflicts a defective relationship on the males, but given the asymmetrical responsibilities between the sexes, the result would likewise be detrimental to women. (Of course, where the latter point is concerned, it is the same with polygyny vis-a-vis men. It's not as if a man is honoring his nature by being a polygamist. It is to his detriment as well.)