4 ms·
You did not read what I wrote. What I said does not go against what NASA is saying there. If anything is a corroboration. Also, how can you say '0 proof', when
by guilhas 7y ago
You did not read what I wrote. What I said does not go against what NASA is saying there. If anything is a corroboration.
Also, how can you say '0 proof', when you asked for government document, and I gave you a link with exactly that, news on government leaked document.
- meerita 7y agoYou linked me an article. I demanded an official document, that states that the amazonia must be take down. The article only states plans to build things, not to disapear the forest. Again, people only read the titles and the accuses.
- guilhas 7y agoPlan to build things to fend off conservationists. And the data of increased deforestation is official. And increased deregulation. And any of these articles sources are more reputable than you insisting that there is no proof of deforestation. Amazon rainforest destruction increases rapidly as Brazil’s far-right president Jair Bolsonaro slashes protections https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rainforest-bolsonaro-brazil-deforestation-logging-mining-climate-change-a9024871.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rai... Besides a news articles is what I am whiling look for, you can demand whatever you want. You wouldn't even understand an official document. That's why we have journalists, to investigate. But if you have the time you can google them yourself or follow the sources in the articles.