3 ms·
That's polyandry, but terminology aside, the same problem vis-a-vis what I've written still exists. There may be sex-specific problems that result from polyandr
by bobthechef 7y ago
That's polyandry, but terminology aside, the same problem vis-a-vis what I've written still exists. There may be sex-specific problems that result from polyandry vs. polygamy, but the same problems mentioned above remain.
- dominotw 7y ago> but the same problems mentioned above remain. Polyandry also objectifies women? how? > That's polyandry, polygamy is a superset of polyandry per dictionary. Your original comment was about polygamy.
- bobthechef 7y agoW.r.t. polyandry, yes, you're right. I was thinking polygyny. My mistake. In terms of polyandry, I meant the non-sex specific, general defects still hold. Certainly, polyandry specifically inflicts a defective relationship on the males, but given the asymmetrical responsibilities between the sexes, the result would likewise be detrimental to women. (Of course, where the latter point is concerned, it is the same with polygyny vis-a-vis men. It's not as if a man is honoring his nature by being a polygamist. It is to his detriment as well.)