4 ms·

It is very bad because the current president policy is to sell and deforest for farms or cattle, without any worry of the ecosystem or native people of the area

It is very bad because the current president policy is to sell and deforest for farms or cattle, without any worry of the ecosystem or native people of the area. Which should be preserve and protect. In terms of the area affected by fire, more burned in Portugal in 2018, which is a very small compared with Amazon size.

meerita 7y ago
Do you have any oficial policy document that support that claim?
- guilhas 7y ago
  When asked about deforestation the president, which is a retarded version of Trump, called himself 'Captain Chainsaw'. And that his government can do whatever they want with their forest. When asked about the fires he blamed the natives and the Amazon protection ONGs. Quick search shows recent leaked documents. But they are unnecessary since the president does not hide his intentions in speeches and interviews. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rainforest-fires-jair-bolsonaro-ngo-san-paolo-a9075071.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rai...
  - meerita 7y ago
    Then you have 0 proof. The NASA Observatory, which studies the amazonian fire seasons since many years contradicts the current situation with evidence https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145464/fires-in-brazil https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145464/fires-in-bra...
    - guilhas 7y ago
      You did not read what I wrote. What I said does not go against what NASA is saying there. If anything is a corroboration. Also, how can you say '0 proof', when you asked for government document, and I gave you a link with exactly that, news on government leaked document.
      - meerita 7y ago
        You linked me an article. I demanded an official document, that states that the amazonia must be take down. The article only states plans to build things, not to disapear the forest. Again, people only read the titles and the accuses.
        guilhas 7y ago
        Plan to build things to fend off conservationists. And the data of increased deforestation is official. And increased deregulation. And any of these articles sources are more reputable than you insisting that there is no proof of deforestation. Amazon rainforest destruction increases rapidly as Brazil’s far-right president Jair Bolsonaro slashes protections https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rainforest-bolsonaro-brazil-deforestation-logging-mining-climate-change-a9024871.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rai... Besides a news articles is what I am whiling look for, you can demand whatever you want. You wouldn't even understand an official document. That's why we have journalists, to investigate. But if you have the time you can google them yourself or follow the sources in the articles.

meerita 7y ago

Do you have any oficial policy document that support that claim?

guilhas 7y ago
When asked about deforestation the president, which is a retarded version of Trump, called himself 'Captain Chainsaw'. And that his government can do whatever they want with their forest. When asked about the fires he blamed the natives and the Amazon protection ONGs. Quick search shows recent leaked documents. But they are unnecessary since the president does not hide his intentions in speeches and interviews. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rainforest-fires-jair-bolsonaro-ngo-san-paolo-a9075071.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rai...
- meerita 7y ago
  Then you have 0 proof. The NASA Observatory, which studies the amazonian fire seasons since many years contradicts the current situation with evidence https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145464/fires-in-brazil https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145464/fires-in-bra...
  - guilhas 7y ago
    You did not read what I wrote. What I said does not go against what NASA is saying there. If anything is a corroboration. Also, how can you say '0 proof', when you asked for government document, and I gave you a link with exactly that, news on government leaked document.
    - meerita 7y ago
      You linked me an article. I demanded an official document, that states that the amazonia must be take down. The article only states plans to build things, not to disapear the forest. Again, people only read the titles and the accuses.
      - guilhas 7y ago
        Plan to build things to fend off conservationists. And the data of increased deforestation is official. And increased deregulation. And any of these articles sources are more reputable than you insisting that there is no proof of deforestation. Amazon rainforest destruction increases rapidly as Brazil’s far-right president Jair Bolsonaro slashes protections https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rainforest-bolsonaro-brazil-deforestation-logging-mining-climate-change-a9024871.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/amazon-rai... Besides a news articles is what I am whiling look for, you can demand whatever you want. You wouldn't even understand an official document. That's why we have journalists, to investigate. But if you have the time you can google them yourself or follow the sources in the articles.