3 ms·
The "manipulation" to stop destroying the planet? To me its all about the accelerated logging in the amazon basin that we know is fatal.
by fwsgonzo 7y ago
The "manipulation" to stop destroying the planet? To me its all about the accelerated logging in the amazon basin that we know is fatal.
- EugeneOZ 7y agoNo. This year Russia lost 3 times more forest and nobody cares :) All the noise is just about politics.
- aliveupstairs 7y agoAny sources on that?
- pvaldes 7y agoA hectare of forest lost in brazil is not equivalent to an hectare lost in Taiga. Biodiversity in taiga is not even remotely close to the biodiversity in rainforests. There are decens of different species of trees, giving fruits, supporting bromeliads, hundreds of orchids, arboreal frogs, monkeys, sloths, macrobats, snails, spiders, scorpions, thousands of different insects, snakes, hundred of birds, raptors, lizards, thousands of different fishes also in the flooded soil ... You will never find that in a taiga's pine. Taiga is a frozen void desert for many months of the year (and has been devoid of most of this former macrofauna yet). Is not always about politics.
- EugeneOZ 7y agoYeah, forest is "frozen void", lol. And each summer it's so "cold" there, that's why forest is in fire every year. Macron says nothing about "biodiversity", he is talking about oxygen. And forest in Siberia makes the same oxygen (maybe just with small scent of vodka). So in this case is just politics.
- vfc1 7y agoHave a look, logging is only 3%, the rest is cattle ranching and agriculture (most of it to produce cattle feed) - https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/posts/2019/08/deforestation_in_the_amazon/35a28f4d2.jpg https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/posts/2019/08/d... I agree it's necessary to force Brasil's hand to take some immediate action, but I just don't like these tactics. What else is in the news for similar type of reasons?