4 ms·
This implies that you have data around if drug users and non-drug users who commit crimes are punished differently, or that you are just flippantly responding t
by wbronitsky 7y ago
This implies that you have data around if drug users and non-drug users who commit crimes are punished differently, or that you are just flippantly responding to a well thought out comment. In the spirit of HN, I'll assume it is the former. Can you show that data?
- rdtwo 7y agoCertain methods of punishment don’t work for people with no assets. So if the city might fine someone with money a couple hundred bucks for urinating on a public building, the city won’t bother with a destitute addict as it’s not going to gain them money and might embarrass government officials. Here is a similar example https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2018/03/05/25878343/when-a-vehicle-is-a-home-city-must-reconsider-tow-fees-judge-rules https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2018/03/05/25878343/when-a-... If I park illegally and get towed well tough shit, if van dweller gets towed the city has violated their rights and it’s terrible. So homeless druggies get free pass to commit all sorts of low level offenses that everyone else gets crazy fines for.