4 ms·
PowerShell works on Linux today. It's consistent and works fine for this Go-developer's needs. It's spectacular to have a shell with consistent verbiage and pa
by electricEmu 7y ago
PowerShell works on Linux today. It's consistent and works fine for this Go-developer's needs.
It's spectacular to have a shell with consistent verbiage and parameters.
https://aka.ms/getps6-linux https://aka.ms/getps6-linux
- lukeschlather 7y agoThe big problem with Powershell, and it makes it borderline unusable on Linux, is its crazy error handling. The equivalent of bash's `set -e` is `$ErrorActionPreference="Stop"`. The problem is that it treats any output to stderr as an error and ignores actual posix errors (non-zero exit codes.) What's worse is in some contexts the error it throws on stderr is impossible to catch. I really love Powershell in a lot of ways but this makes a lot of really basic scripts in bash very cumbersome to write in Powershell.
- geekone 7y agoDo you have any examples of stderr errors being impossible to catch in PS, and/or a basic script that is very easy in Bash but cumbersome in PowerShell?
- lukeschlather 7y agoRecently I was trying to automate something with gsutil (Google's storage CLI) using Powershell remoting to a Windows host. gsutil is a totally well-behaved posix app, which emits status information to stderr. The bug is specifically that when using remoting (Windows equivalent of ssh) the error is uncatchable. [Remoting Bug] https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/issues/3996 https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/issues/3996 [RFC for improved error handling] https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell-RFC/pull/88 https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell-RFC/pull/88 Ultimately I just want Powershell to handle well-behaved posix apps in a sane way, but honestly the reaction of some of the people on the thread seems like there's a huge cultural gap between Microsoft and the Posix community. (Which, Microsoft claims to be a part of but clearly is not.)