4 ms·
> This is flat out wrong Only if you assume value == money. The question is not whether advertisers will pay extra for tracking-based advertising (your definit
by kodablah 7y ago
> This is flat out wrong
Only if you assume value == money. The question is not whether advertisers will pay extra for tracking-based advertising (your definition of "value"), the question is whether they are getting what they're paying extra for (what others are considering "value"). That someone pays for extra for something doesn't not necessarily mean it's worth it.
- amazingman 7y agoWhile I agree with you philosophically, you are using a different definition of “value” than the parent, i.e. you are talking past the point of the parent comment.