4 ms·
> “OOP is prevalent because cheap OOP developers are readily available, while functional programmers are typically more smart, and more expensive…” Yuck-o. Tha
by nategri 7y ago
> “OOP is prevalent because cheap OOP developers are readily available, while functional programmers are typically more smart, and more expensive…”
Yuck-o. That's a physically painful amount of bias.
- overkalix 7y agoThat was embarrassing to read. I can program decently in Scala and a bit in Elixir and I'm a goddamn moron...
- mruts 7y agoHe never said functional programmers weren't morons, he just said they were "more smart."
- DaiPlusPlus 7y agoEven if it’s true (I don’t claim it is) because FP’s brick-wall learning curve is a huge filter - given that FP isn’t widely used in SE (and you don’t need to learn FP to make lots of money doing SE) - the people spending time to learn FP will be doing it for esoteric-appeal or intellectual curiosity - which can be argued is a better indicator of general intelligence - the same way that people who know and write OCaml, COBOL, Ada and Erlang today are probably very smart.
- tome 7y agoThis is basically Paul Graham's argument in "The Python Paradox". http://www.paulgraham.com/pypar.html http://www.paulgraham.com/pypar.html