3 ms·
That would be related to the 2 following years when the problem absolutely blew up, to the point that 51 AGs had to take further action. He paid lip service bu
by awinder 7y ago
That would be related to the 2 following years when the problem absolutely blew up, to the point that 51 AGs had to take further action. He paid lip service but we should demand more.
- ars 7y agoWait -- you think after he published this, it was supposed to be implemented the next day or something? 2 years is a perfectly reasonable amount of time to implement this. > to the point that 51 AGs had to take further action. You really like to see malice in people don't you? He did all the actual work, but you give the credit to the 51 AGs. Not only do you not give him credit, you actually give him negative points for doing this? What in the universe makes you think AGs can do anything about this without the FCC taking point? > (and under duress at that; he didn't pay this issue any attention until political blowback started). I don't get you. This statement is clearly false, I even gave you references, and you're still holding your position? Who am I kidding, I know exactly why you are talking this way, he's Republican, you're Democrat, and bashing the other party is the order of the day, never mind what they've actually done. And if you think I'm wrong - give me dates. Give me the date that "political blowback started", and even better, give me the date when you think he started paying attention to this. Because I gave you a date - and it was within months of him becoming chairman.