4 ms·
the author has some points, but he does not mention something obvious to the reader: He was always at the mercy of Twitter. It was his fortune that the cap was
by lhnn 16y ago
the author has some points, but he does not mention something obvious to the reader: He was always at the mercy of Twitter. It was his fortune that the cap was increased at his whim, and only now have they stopped it, for whatever reason.
The reason sounds fishy, and his retort is well-founded, but it's an important thing to note.
- coffeedrinker 16y agoI hate being at the mercy of another; that is why I have my own business. However... I just had my first major rejection from the app store on a unreleased app (similar to an already approved app called Fresh Faces, which has been approved four times). I got a phone call from Apple today telling me it was rejected because it violated section 18.2. I should have asked him to read it to me because I think he was too embarrassed to let me know what it said. He mumbled something about "social media" blah blah. Well, I looked up 18.2 and was insulted. 'Apps that contain user generated content that is frequently pornographic (ex "Chat Roulette" apps) will be rejected.' My apps allow users to upload photos of themselves and have others rate them. All photos are examined before posting, and I would never allow anything bad to be posted. By this standard, any app that allows users to create and view photos should be banned. Today I downloaded the Android development kit.