3 ms·
Hmm disagree. This was a very lightweight “hey you’re defending a pretty terrible act”. Surely there is value to socially pressuring people who offer morally r
by ryanobjc 7y ago
Hmm disagree. This was a very lightweight “hey you’re defending a pretty terrible act”.
Surely there is value to socially pressuring people who offer morally reprehensible positions?
My child had one of these low quality, high lead toys amazon sells. Babies put everything in their mouth. He was exposed to, minimal, but as we know there is no safe exposure limit to lead.
So, dang, tell em again how this amazon employee defending putting lead into children’s bloodstreams is... well I guess I just shouldn’t personally attack them, just the terrible things they are defending.
- dang 7y ago"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html