4 ms·

Working four hours a week is revolutionary. Working out four hours a week is ... average. If you spend four hours a week doing any sort of strength training in

Working four hours a week is revolutionary. Working out four hours a week is ... average. If you spend four hours a week doing any sort of strength training in a semi-competent manner, you are going to look good after a period of months. (And you won't even need to weigh your feces!) I fail to see why we need 571 pages of rebelling against conventional wisdom here.

ph0rque 16y ago
I believe it's working out 4 hours a month, not a week.
eof 16y ago
I believe it's 4 hours a month.
ipince 16y ago
Indeed, he claims he achieved his results by working out 4 hours in 28 days. Even so, working out 4 hours per week without changing your diet or just working out in a "semi-competent" manner will probably not bring you the results he claims to have gotten. You should at least familiarize yourself with the claims before denying them.
- tome 16y ago
  Somehow a gym subscription that you're going to use for 4 hours a month seems like a waste of money.
  - lincolnq 16y ago
    Derp? If you're getting the damn results, who cares how many hours you spend?
    - tome 16y ago
      Someone who would like to spend their money more efficiently.
- Swannie 16y ago
  The problem is how it's measured. Is that measured as door to door at the gym? Weight room door to weight room door? Or time on the iron? If you measure time on the iron, it is very short. The reality is a lot of your time is spent between sets, recovering, and then showering and changing afterwards. Same as his "4 hour work week" measurement...
  - SwellJoe 16y ago
    A 20-30 minute workout a few times a month is much less than anyone expects to spend on exercise for dramatic gains, no matter how you slice up the time and how much ancillary stuff you include in the "time at gym" equation. All of the classes at my gym are ~60 minutes. I'm doing Occam's Protocol from the book, and I get in, do my lifts, shower, and get back out, long before those classes finish their workout. And, I go much less frequently than I thought was necessary: a couple times a week. I haven't been doing it long enough to know what the results will be, but the science is solid.
teye 16y ago
Because, according to him, >90% of what you'll do in the gym isn't necessary. So he offers training programs for a bunch of different goals (speed, strength, vertical, etc) while citing elite coaches that work with some of the most extraordinary and accomplished athletes for each case.

ph0rque 16y ago

I believe it's working out 4 hours a month, not a week.

eof 16y ago

I believe it's 4 hours a month.

ipince 16y ago

Indeed, he claims he achieved his results by working out 4 hours in 28 days. Even so, working out 4 hours per week without changing your diet or just working out in a "semi-competent" manner will probably not bring you the results he claims to have gotten. You should at least familiarize yourself with the claims before denying them.

tome 16y ago
Somehow a gym subscription that you're going to use for 4 hours a month seems like a waste of money.
- lincolnq 16y ago
  Derp? If you're getting the damn results, who cares how many hours you spend?
  - tome 16y ago
    Someone who would like to spend their money more efficiently.
Swannie 16y ago
The problem is how it's measured. Is that measured as door to door at the gym? Weight room door to weight room door? Or time on the iron? If you measure time on the iron, it is very short. The reality is a lot of your time is spent between sets, recovering, and then showering and changing afterwards. Same as his "4 hour work week" measurement...
- SwellJoe 16y ago
  A 20-30 minute workout a few times a month is much less than anyone expects to spend on exercise for dramatic gains, no matter how you slice up the time and how much ancillary stuff you include in the "time at gym" equation. All of the classes at my gym are ~60 minutes. I'm doing Occam's Protocol from the book, and I get in, do my lifts, shower, and get back out, long before those classes finish their workout. And, I go much less frequently than I thought was necessary: a couple times a week. I haven't been doing it long enough to know what the results will be, but the science is solid.

teye 16y ago

Because, according to him, >90% of what you'll do in the gym isn't necessary. So he offers training programs for a bunch of different goals (speed, strength, vertical, etc) while citing elite coaches that work with some of the most extraordinary and accomplished athletes for each case.