8 ms·

At the expense of being practically unusable for most people. It's a trade off. EDIT: This proposal also suffers from a bootstrapping problem. You have to alr

At the expense of being practically unusable for most people. It's a trade off. EDIT: This proposal also suffers from a bootstrapping problem. You have to already have a secure channel to communicate the ids.

ubercow13 7y ago
You have to have a secure channel to exchange phone numbers too. The code could be communicated simply using a QR code. Other messengers already work this way and it works well.
- couchand 7y ago
  Yes, the difference being that a phone number is an established identity mechanism and you likely already know it.
  - ubercow13 7y ago
    Yes but it's a kind of bad one. There are many ways you can lose or change your phone number. Email address is a better identifier.
codedokode 7y ago
Signal could allow both options: register with a phone number or with completely anonymous logins. I think they just don't want anonymous users, visits from FBI etc. Also, it is not very profitable to sell ads to anonymous users.