This sort of finding always makes me wonder if the issue is that there are somehow loads of programmers who have apparently had long careers who can’t program o

This sort of finding always makes me wonder if the issue is that there are somehow loads of programmers who have apparently had long careers who can’t program or if there is something wrong with the method of determining it? With quotes like: > So, as someone who spends maybe 20% of their time hiring, it’s still a very effective screen. You wouldn’t believe how many people can’t do it. People at big companies, respected places. It’s surprising. Shouldn’t people start questioning the validity of their method?