4 ms·
Actually it's not, there are biological effects seen in rats which while not fully understood, have been replicated across more than one trial. https://www.sci
by dwd 7y ago
Actually it's not, there are biological effects seen in rats which while not fully understood, have been replicated across more than one trial.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-studies-link-cell-phone-radiation-with-cancer/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-studies-link-...
Sure rats aren't humans but that doesn't mean we're not going to be seeing the same damage occurring at a cellular level. We may just have mechanisms that prevent that damage becoming cancerous.
- LargoLasskhyfv 7y agoTry https://tbiomed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4682-9-26 https://tbiomed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4682... My conclusion from that is if cells communicate via EMF internally and externally, then this can be jammed by the right artificial EMF from the outside. Question is if contemporary cell phones, Wifi, etc. have "the right stuff". TBD
- dwd 7y agoVery interesting line of study. There was a case of a cancer cluster among female staff at the Australian Broadcasting Commission's Toowong Building that went largely unexplained. While everyone speculated it had something to do with the radio tower there, nothing conclusive was determined. https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/cancer-clusters-20130309-2frwd.html https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/cancer-clusters-20130309-2f...